Over 60 countries banned Paraquat because it’s deadly enough to kill with a single sip. Yet it’s still sprayed across American farms.
If Paraquat exposure led to Parkinson’s, you’re not alone. Lawsuits are stacking up fast, backed by science and testimony from people who got sick doing their jobs or living near farmland.
Call (833) 552-7274 today or contact us online. At LitigationConnect, our network of lawyers will connect you with someone local who’s already in the fight.
Contact Our Team Today
Overview of Paraquat
Paraquat is a weed-killing chemical designed to eliminate stubborn vegetation fast—aggressively fast. Originally developed in the early 1960s, farmers still widely use it today across U.S. farmland, especially for clearing fields of resistant weeds and unwanted plant growth.
But, there was just one tiny problem. It’s incredibly toxic to human life. In fact, paraquat ranks among the most poisonous herbicides commercially available, capable of causing fatal consequences from even minimal exposure.
More than 32 countries, including every nation in the European Union, banned paraquat outright due to its alarming toxicity. Yet in America, regulatory agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allow its continued use under tight restrictions outlined by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Manufacturers and applicators must adhere to stringent safety rules, including special certification, protective gear, and storage precautions mandated by federal law (40 CFR Part 171). Despite these regulations, agricultural workers frequently face exposure through accidental inhalation, skin contact, or even traces in drinking water.
Paraquat functions rapidly by destroying the chlorophyll in plants, effectively suffocating them within hours of application. Unfortunately, the same aggressive properties that make paraquat so effective against weeds also make it dangerous for humans. Direct ingestion leads to rapid, irreversible damage to internal organs, particularly the lungs, liver, and kidneys. Even brief skin contact or inhalation over time triggers significant health consequences, including neurological damage and chronic illnesses like Parkinson’s disease.
Health Risks Associated with Paraquat
Farm workers don’t sign up to get Parkinson’s, yet exposure to paraquat significantly increases their odds. Parkinson’s attacks your nervous system, gradually killing dopamine-producing neurons in your brain. Symptoms begin subtly but escalate aggressively, including:
- Tremors in your hands, arms, legs, and face.
- Slow, stiff movements that make routine tasks exhausting.
- Balance problems and coordination loss.
- Cognitive decline, anxiety, and depression as dopamine levels plummet.
The connection between paraquat and Parkinson’s stems from the chemical’s toxicity to brain cells. Paraquat triggers oxidative stress, an aggressive biological reaction that damages and destroys neurons. Over time, even low-level exposure accumulates, silently corroding brain functions until symptoms emerge, often decades after initial contact.
How Exposure Happens
Paraquat enters your system primarily through three routes:
1. Inhalation:
Farm workers spraying crops directly breathe microscopic droplets. Paraquat vapors linger in the air, especially on hot or windy days, increasing inhalation risks for anyone nearby.
2. Skin Contact:
Handling equipment, spraying paraquat, or even walking through treated fields risks direct skin absorption. It easily penetrates through clothing or gloves, bypassing protective measures unless meticulous safety procedures mandated by OSHA standards (29 CFR 1910.132) are rigorously followed.
3. Ingestion:
Accidental swallowing rarely happens deliberately, yet small amounts contaminate water sources, food, or surfaces touched by contaminated hands. Even minuscule doses threaten long-term neurological damage.
Who’s at Risk
Farmers, agricultural laborers, herbicide applicators, and anyone routinely near treated fields face the highest exposure levels. But proximity alone poses threats: families living near agricultural areas endure indirect exposure through airborne particles or water contamination. Rural communities suffer higher rates of Parkinson’s disease due to these exposures, further supported by multiple epidemiological studies.
Legal Basis for Paraquat Lawsuits
When companies profit at the expense of health, the law steps in. Paraquat lawsuits hinge primarily on one serious accusation: manufacturers knew about the herbicide’s dangers but conveniently failed to warn anyone.
Under American product liability law—specifically doctrines like negligence, strict liability, and failure to warn—companies that manufacture or distribute hazardous products have clear legal duties. These duties include disclosing known risks and ensuring consumers understand potential dangers, as outlined in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A. Ignoring or deliberately hiding those risks lands companies in legal trouble, as alleged against paraquat producers Syngenta and Chevron.
Failure to Warn Claims
At the heart of most paraquat lawsuits is what's called "failure to warn." Legally, that means a company knew or reasonably should have known about a product’s dangers but didn't adequately communicate these hazards. Plaintiffs assert companies like Syngenta violated state and federal laws—including FIFRA labeling requirements (7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq.)—by withholding accurate information connecting paraquat exposure to Parkinson’s.
In court documents, plaintiffs argue:
- Paraquat manufacturers had scientific studies dating back decades demonstrating serious neurological harm, yet kept quiet.
- Labels failed to clearly state the severity of risks, misrepresenting paraquat as safe if handled properly.
- Training and protective measures provided to farm workers remained insufficient or unclear, violating Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations (29 CFR 1910 Subpart I).
Strict Liability and Negligence Claims
Beyond "failure to warn," plaintiffs also file claims based on strict liability and negligence. Strict liability means a company is responsible for harm caused by inherently dangerous products, regardless of intent or care taken during manufacturing. Basically, if the product harms users despite proper handling, the company still pays.
Negligence claims go further. They accuse manufacturers of actively ignoring or downplaying research about paraquat’s health impacts. Plaintiffs cite internal memos, industry studies, and medical journals, alleging companies deliberately chose profits over public safety, violating common law negligence standards defined by state courts nationwide.
Eligibility Criteria for Filing a Paraquat Lawsuit
Not everyone exposed to paraquat automatically qualifies for legal action. Lawyers and courts want specifics. They’ll dig into your history, examining details that prove clear exposure linked to real harm.
Significant Exposure to Paraquat
Courts pay attention to how, when, and for how long paraquat exposure happened. Your attorney will look at things like:
- Occupational exposure: Farmers, agricultural laborers, landscapers, and herbicide applicators frequently come into direct contact. Employment records, job descriptions, and paraquat usage logs prove regular, substantial exposure.
- Secondary exposure: Living near farmland or areas regularly treated with paraquat isn’t harmless. Residential proximity, wind drift reports, or contamination records can confirm indirect but harmful contact.
Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis
Simply being exposed isn’t enough. Lawyers require medical proof directly tying paraquat exposure to Parkinson’s disease or other serious neurological harm. Your attorney will typically require:
- Medical records explicitly confirming a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis from qualified neurologists or specialists.
- Documentation showing symptom progression and timelines to prove your illness aligns with known scientific patterns linking paraquat to neurological diseases.
Process of Filing a Paraquat Lawsuit
Filing a lawsuit sounds intimidating—courtrooms, lawyers, paperwork—but breaking it down step by step makes it straightforward. Lawyers handle the heavy lifting, but knowing the process keeps you in control, prepared, and confident about moving forward.
Step One: Consult with a Specialized Attorney
First, you need the right lawyer—one with specific experience in toxic exposure and product liability. Generic injury lawyers won’t cut it here because paraquat cases require technical expertise. During the initial consultation, your lawyer reviews your history of exposure and symptoms, assessing whether your situation matches established legal precedents.
Step Two: Gather Evidence of Paraquat Exposure
Next, lawyers need concrete proof linking you directly to paraquat. They’ll look for things like:
- Employment records or pay stubs confirming work with or near paraquat.
- Logs or purchase records from farms or employers documenting paraquat use.
- Property records, residential histories, or witness testimony verifying proximity to treated agricultural areas.
Step Three: Secure Medical Documentation
This step gets personal. Courts want official documentation of your illness. Attorneys collect:
- Medical records confirming Parkinson’s diagnosis from neurologists or movement disorder specialists.
- Test results, MRI scans, and physician notes detailing symptom progression and treatment history.
Step Four: File the Complaint
Once evidence stacks up, your lawyer officially files a legal complaint. This document outlines specific allegations against paraquat manufacturers—like Syngenta or Chevron—and clearly states how they violated laws (such as FIFRA’s labeling requirements under 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq. or common law negligence).
Step Five: Legal Discovery
Discovery means exchanging evidence and documents between parties. Lawyers use depositions (recorded witness interviews under oath), interrogatories (written questions), and document subpoenas to gather deeper insights. Expect questions from both sides designed to clarify and challenge facts.
Step Six: Settlement Negotiations or Trial
Most cases settle before reaching trial. Settlement negotiations involve detailed discussions about compensation, responsibility, and specific damages. If parties agree, the lawsuit concludes without ever entering a courtroom. If they don’t, your case moves to trial, typically involving a jury who hears evidence and decides responsibility.
Throughout the process, your lawyer handles complexities, but your involvement ensures the case reflects your experience accurately—giving you the best possible outcome.
Current Status of Paraquat Litigation
Thousands of lawsuits across America have piled up against paraquat manufacturers, and now they're facing real heat. These lawsuits aren't scattered randomly across courts—instead, they're consolidated into a single, massive multidistrict litigation (MDL). Currently, the Paraquat MDL is centralized in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois under Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel, as ordered by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML).
Multidistrict Litigation Explained (Briefly)
MDLs aren't your standard courtroom dramas. They streamline multiple cases with common issues into one federal court, cutting redundancy and ensuring consistency. Plaintiffs maintain individual cases, but the court handles shared pretrial procedures collectively—like discovery, evidence gathering, and preliminary rulings on liability.
Bellwether Trials Scheduled for 2025
Right now, bellwether trials—the initial, representative cases used to gauge how future trials might play out—are set to begin in 2025. These cases offer clues about potential verdicts and settlement values. Judges, lawyers, and plaintiffs pay close attention because they shape how the litigation will move forward.
If bellwether trials yield significant verdicts against Syngenta, Chevron, or other manufacturers, it pressures defendants toward global settlements, potentially ending thousands of lawsuits simultaneously. Conversely, outcomes favoring manufacturers might encourage them to fight harder or settle for lower amounts.
Importance of Acting Promptly
The clock starts ticking as soon as Parkinson’s symptoms appear, and courts don't care about excuses. Every state sets strict deadlines, called statutes of limitations, limiting how long you have to file a paraquat lawsuit. Miss that window, and no matter how strong your evidence, your case vanishes overnight.
For instance:
- California gives plaintiffs two years from the date they discover Parkinson’s linked to paraquat exposure (California Code of Civil Procedure §335.1).
- Illinois also enforces a two-year limit for personal injury claims, starting from diagnosis or when you reasonably should have known about the illness (735 ILCS 5/13-202).
Waiting doesn’t buy more time—it risks losing your claim entirely. Memories fade, records disappear, witnesses move on. The sooner you act, the stronger your case stays.
Hold Paraquat Manufacturers Accountable—Start Today
Companies sprayed poison, shrugged, and hoped no one would notice. Now they’re being dragged into court by people who refused to stay silent. You deserve that same shot.
Call (833) 552-7274 today or contact us online. At LitigationConnect, our network of lawyers will connect you with a local attorney who’s already fighting these cases and ready to take yours on next.